36  Various Authorities under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

ImportantLearning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, the reader will be able to:

  1. Identify the six categories of authority under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the constitutional and procedural provisions governing each.
  2. Apply the constitution, jurisdiction, and powers of the Conciliation Officer (Section 4) and Board of Conciliation (Section 5).
  3. Apply the constitution, jurisdiction, and powers of the Court of Inquiry (Section 6).
  4. Apply the constitution, jurisdiction, and powers of the Labour Court (Section 7), Industrial Tribunal (Section 7A), and National Tribunal (Section 7B).
  5. Identify the role of voluntary arbitration under Section 10A and the relationship between the various authorities and the appropriate government’s reference power under Section 10.

36.1 Introduction

This chapter examines the institutional architecture of dispute resolution under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in detail. The Act provides for six categories of authority, each with distinct constitution, jurisdiction, and powers. The treatment is organised around the conciliation authorities (Conciliation Officer, Board of Conciliation), the inquiry authority (Court of Inquiry), the adjudication authorities (Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal, National Tribunal), and the voluntary arbitration framework.

flowchart TD
    A["Industrial Dispute"] --> B[Conciliation]
    A --> C[Voluntary Arbitration]
    A --> D[Adjudication]
    A --> E[Court of Inquiry]

    B --> B1["Section 4 <br> Conciliation Officer"]
    B --> B2["Section 5 <br> Board of Conciliation"]

    C --> C1["Section 10A <br> Arbitrator"]

    D --> D1["Section 7 <br> Labour Court"]
    D --> D2["Section 7A <br> Industrial Tribunal"]
    D --> D3["Section 7B <br> National Tribunal"]

    E --> E1["Section 6 <br> Court of Inquiry"]

    %% Style
    classDef dark fill:#004466,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
    class A,B,C,D,E,B1,B2,C1,D1,D2,D3,E1 dark;


36.2 Conciliation Authorities

36.2.1 Conciliation Officer (Section 4)

NoteSection 4: Conciliation Officers

“The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint such number of persons as it thinks fit, to be conciliation officers, charged with the duty of mediating in and promoting the settlement of industrial disputes.

A conciliation officer may be appointed for a specified area or for specified industries in a specified area or for one or more specified industries and either permanently or for a limited period.”

The Conciliation Officer is the first-line authority for the resolution of industrial disputes. Conciliation Officers are typically Labour Officers or Assistant Labour Commissioners appointed by the appropriate government. The Officer’s role is to facilitate negotiation between the parties and to promote a settlement.

The Conciliation Officer has the following powers:

  1. To enter premises where the dispute exists or has occurred;
  2. To call for and inspect documents;
  3. To examine on oath any person concerning the dispute;
  4. To conduct hearings.

The Conciliation Officer’s role is mediatory rather than adjudicatory. The Officer cannot impose a settlement; the parties must agree. Where the conciliation succeeds, the resulting settlement is recorded under Section 12. Where conciliation fails, the Officer submits a failure report to the appropriate government, which then decides whether to refer the dispute to adjudication.

36.2.2 Board of Conciliation (Section 5)

NoteSection 5: Boards of Conciliation

“The appropriate Government may as occasion arises by notification in the Official Gazette constitute a Board of Conciliation for promoting the settlement of an industrial dispute.

A Board shall consist of a chairman and two or four other members, as the appropriate Government thinks fit.

The chairman shall be an independent person, and the other members shall be persons appointed in equal numbers to represent the parties to the dispute.

A person appointed to represent a party shall be appointed on the recommendation of that party.”

The Board of Conciliation is a higher conciliation forum, typically constituted for more substantial or complex disputes. The Board’s role is similar to that of the Conciliation Officer (facilitative rather than adjudicatory) but its tripartite constitution (independent chairman plus equal employer and worker representation) and its formal hearings give it greater authority.

The Board has powers similar to those of a civil court for the purpose of inquiry, including examination of witnesses on oath, requisition of documents, and issuance of summons. Where the conciliation succeeds, the settlement is recorded; where it fails, a failure report is submitted to the appropriate government.

TipBoards of Conciliation Are Now Rarely Used

A practitioner observation worth emphasising is that Boards of Conciliation are now rarely used in Indian practice. The administrative burden of constitution, the time required for hearings, and the absence of binding adjudicatory power have made the Conciliation Officer the standard forum, with Industrial Tribunals as the principal forum for binding adjudication.


36.3 Court of Inquiry (Section 6)

NoteSection 6: Courts of Inquiry

“The appropriate Government may as occasion arises by notification in the Official Gazette constitute a Court of Inquiry for inquiring into any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to an industrial dispute.

A Court may consist of one independent person or of such number of independent persons as the appropriate Government may think fit and where a Court consists of two or more members, one of them shall be appointed as the chairman.”

The Court of Inquiry is constituted to investigate matters relating to industrial disputes. Its role is investigative rather than adjudicatory. The Court submits a report to the appropriate government within six months (or such longer period as may be permitted), setting out its findings on the matters inquired into.

The Court of Inquiry is rarely used in contemporary practice. The principal contexts in which it has been used historically include investigation of major industrial accidents, examination of broad industry-wide labour issues, and gathering of information to inform policy decisions.


36.4 Adjudication Authorities

The principal forums for binding adjudication of industrial disputes are the Labour Court (Section 7), the Industrial Tribunal (Section 7A), and the National Tribunal (Section 7B). Each has distinct jurisdiction and constitution.

36.4.1 Labour Court (Section 7)

NoteSection 7: Labour Courts

“The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Labour Courts for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter specified in the Second Schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under this Act.

A Labour Court shall consist of one person only to be appointed by the appropriate Government.

A person shall not be qualified for appointment as the presiding officer of a Labour Court unless:

  1. he is, or has been, a Judge of a High Court; or

  2. he has, for a period of not less than three years, been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge; or

  3. he has held any judicial office in India for not less than seven years; or

  4. he has been the presiding officer of a Labour Court constituted under any Provincial Act or State Act for not less than five years.”

36.4.2 Second Schedule Matters

The Second Schedule lists matters within the jurisdiction of the Labour Court:

  1. The propriety or legality of an order passed by an employer under the standing orders;

  2. The application and interpretation of standing orders;

  3. Discharge or dismissal of workmen including reinstatement of, or grant of relief to, workmen wrongfully dismissed;

  4. Withdrawal of any customary concession or privilege;

  5. Illegality or otherwise of a strike or lock-out; and

  6. All matters other than those specified in the Third Schedule.

The Labour Court is the principal forum for individual workman disputes about discharge, dismissal, transfer, and discipline.

36.4.3 Industrial Tribunal (Section 7A)

NoteSection 7A: Industrial Tribunals

“The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more Industrial Tribunals for the adjudication of industrial disputes relating to any matter, whether specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule and for performing such other functions as may be assigned to them under this Act.

A Tribunal shall consist of one person only to be appointed by the appropriate Government.

The qualifications for the presiding officer of a Tribunal are similar to those of a Labour Court, with the addition that the appropriate Government may also appoint two persons as assessors to advise the Tribunal in the proceedings.”

36.4.4 Third Schedule Matters

The Third Schedule lists matters within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Industrial Tribunal:

  1. Wages, including the period and mode of payment;

  2. Compensatory and other allowances;

  3. Hours of work and rest intervals;

  4. Leave with wages and holidays;

  5. Bonus, profit-sharing, provident fund, and gratuity;

  6. Shift working otherwise than in accordance with standing orders;

  7. Classification by grades;

  8. Rules of discipline;

  9. Rationalisation;

  10. Retrenchment of workmen and closure of establishment; and

  11. Any other matter that may be prescribed.

The Industrial Tribunal is the principal forum for collective disputes about wages, conditions, and policy matters that affect a substantial body of workers.

36.4.5 National Tribunal (Section 7B)

NoteSection 7B: National Tribunals

“The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, constitute one or more National Industrial Tribunals for the adjudication of industrial disputes which, in the opinion of the Central Government:

  1. involve questions of national importance, or

  2. are of such a nature that industrial establishments situated in more than one State are likely to be interested in, or affected by, such disputes.

A National Tribunal shall consist of one person only to be appointed by the Central Government, with qualifications similar to those of a Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal.

The Central Government may, if it thinks fit, appoint two persons as assessors to advise the National Tribunal in the proceedings.”

The National Tribunal is constituted only by the central government and only for disputes of national importance or affecting establishments in multiple states. The forum is rarely used in practice but provides the institutional capacity for nationally significant industrial disputes.

36.4.6 Comparative Summary

NoteComparative Summary of Adjudication Authorities
Dimension Labour Court (Section 7) Industrial Tribunal (Section 7A) National Tribunal (Section 7B)
Constituted by Appropriate government Appropriate government Central government only
Jurisdiction Second Schedule matters Second and Third Schedule matters Disputes of national importance or multi-state
Composition One presiding officer One presiding officer (plus optional assessors) One presiding officer (plus optional assessors)
Typical matters Individual disputes about discharge, dismissal, discipline Collective disputes about wages, conditions, policy National-scope disputes
Frequency of use Routine Routine Rare

36.5 Voluntary Arbitration (Section 10A)

NoteSection 10A: Voluntary Reference of Disputes to Arbitration

“Where any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended and the employer and the workmen agree to refer the dispute to arbitration, they may, at any time before the dispute has been referred under section 10 to a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal, by a written agreement, refer the dispute to arbitration and the reference shall be to such person or persons (including the presiding officer of a Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal) as an arbitrator or arbitrators as may be specified in the arbitration agreement.”

Voluntary arbitration under Section 10A provides an alternative to government-referred adjudication. The parties agree on the arbitrator and the terms of reference. The arbitrator’s award is binding on the parties and has the same effect as an adjudication award.

The voluntary arbitration provision was introduced in 1956 to expand the options for dispute resolution beyond the government-controlled adjudication track. The provision has been used in some sectors (notably banking) but has not displaced the standard adjudication framework as the principal route.


36.6 Reference Power of the Appropriate Government (Section 10)

NoteSection 10: Reference of Disputes to Boards, Courts or Tribunals

“Where the appropriate Government is of opinion that any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, it may at any time, by order in writing:

  1. refer the dispute to a Board of Conciliation for promoting a settlement thereof; or

  2. refer any matter appearing to be connected with or relevant to the dispute to a Court of Inquiry; or

  3. refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, if it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule, to a Labour Court for adjudication; or

  4. refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the Second Schedule or the Third Schedule, to an Industrial Tribunal for adjudication.”

The reference power of the appropriate government under Section 10 is the principal mechanism by which industrial disputes reach the adjudication authorities. The appropriate government decides which forum to refer the dispute to and what specific issues to refer.

The reference power has historically been a substantive policy lever, with governments using it to channel disputes towards or away from particular forums based on policy considerations. The Code on Industrial Relations, 2020 contemplates streamlining of the reference framework.


36.7 The Award and Its Effect

36.7.1 Publication of the Award

Section 17 requires the award of a Labour Court, Tribunal, or National Tribunal to be published in the Official Gazette by the appropriate government within thirty days from the date of receipt of the award.

36.7.2 Commencement of the Award

NoteSection 17A: Commencement of the Award

“An award (including an arbitration award) shall become enforceable on the expiry of thirty days from the date of its publication under section 17:

Provided that:

  1. if the appropriate Government is of opinion, in any case where the award has been given by a Labour Court or Tribunal in relation to an industrial dispute to which it is a party, that it will be inexpedient on public grounds affecting national economy or social justice to give effect to the whole or any part of the award, the appropriate Government may by notification in the Official Gazette declare that the award shall not become enforceable on the expiry of the said period of thirty days; and

  2. if the Central Government is of opinion, in any case where the award has been given by a National Tribunal, that it will be inexpedient on public grounds affecting national economy or social justice to give effect to the whole or any part of the award, the Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette declare that the award shall not become enforceable on the expiry of the said period of thirty days.”

The 30-day delay between publication and commencement provides time for any government intervention under the public-interest exception.

36.7.3 Period of Operation

NoteSection 19: Period of Operation of Settlements and Awards

“A settlement shall come into operation on such date as is agreed upon by the parties to the dispute, and if no date is agreed upon, on the date on which the memorandum of the settlement is signed by the parties to the dispute.

Such settlement shall be binding for such period as is agreed upon by the parties, and if no such period is agreed upon, for a period of six months from the date on which the memorandum of settlement is signed by the parties to the dispute, and shall continue to be binding on the parties after the expiry of the period aforesaid until the expiry of two months from the date on which a notice in writing of an intention to terminate the settlement is given by one of the parties to the other party or parties to the settlement.

An award shall, subject to the provisions of this section, remain in operation for a period of one year from the date on which the award becomes enforceable under section 17A.”

The Section 19 framework provides specific durations for the binding force of settlements and awards, with mechanisms for termination.


36.8 Case Studies

36.8.1 Case Study 1: A Conciliation Officer Resolving a Wage Dispute

A workers’ union and an employer engaged in a wage dispute approach the Conciliation Officer. The Officer convenes meetings with both sides over several weeks, facilitates the exchange of data on cost of living, comparable settlements, and the company’s financial position, identifies the points of agreement and disagreement, and proposes compromises.

Eventually a settlement is reached on a phased wage revision over three years, supplementing the wage revision with productivity-linked variable pay, and addressing several non-wage issues including leave and grievance redressal. The settlement is recorded under Section 12, signed by representatives of both sides and the Conciliation Officer, and binding under Section 18 on all the workers represented.

Discussion Questions

  1. To what extent does the Conciliation Officer’s mediatory role differ from that of an arbitrator or adjudicator, and what skills are required for effective conciliation?
  2. How should the Conciliation Officer balance the interests of the workers and the employer in proposing compromises?
  3. What features of the settlement should support its enduring effectiveness over the period of operation?

36.8.2 Case Study 2: A Labour Court Adjudication of a Dismissal Dispute

A workman is dismissed by an employer for serious misconduct (theft of company property). The workman challenges the dismissal as illegal and seeks reinstatement with back wages. The matter is referred by the appropriate government to the Labour Court under Section 10(c).

The Labour Court conducts proceedings, hears evidence from both sides (including witness testimony, documentary evidence, and CCTV footage where available), considers the procedural compliance with the standing orders and natural justice, and issues an award. The award may uphold the dismissal, set aside the dismissal with reinstatement and full back wages, or set aside the dismissal with reinstatement on modified terms (such as no back wages or a lesser punishment).

Discussion Questions

  1. To what extent should the Labour Court substitute its judgment for that of the employer’s disciplinary authority in matters of factual finding and quantum of punishment?
  2. How does the Labour Court’s award interact with the broader employment relationship between the worker and the employer post-reinstatement?
  3. What lessons does the case offer for the design of disciplinary procedures by employers to support their case in subsequent Labour Court proceedings?

36.8.3 Case Study 3: An Industrial Tribunal Award on a Wage Settlement

A wage dispute affecting 5,000 workers in a public sector enterprise is referred to the Industrial Tribunal after the breakdown of conciliation. The Tribunal conducts proceedings over several months, hears expert evidence on cost of living, comparable wage settlements, the enterprise’s financial position, and productivity benchmarks.

The Tribunal issues an award fixing the wage revision, the dearness allowance formula, the variable pay framework, the working hours, and other matters at issue. The award is published in the Official Gazette and becomes enforceable after 30 days. The award is binding on the enterprise and all its workmen for one year, with continuation thereafter until terminated.

Discussion Questions

  1. To what extent should the Industrial Tribunal’s award be based on independent judgment versus deference to the parties’ positions and the broader industry context?
  2. How does the Section 17A public-interest exception interact with the Tribunal’s award, and what is the appropriate scope of government intervention?
  3. What lessons does the case offer for the design of industrial relations strategy by large public sector enterprises?

Summary

Concept Description
Six Categories of Authority
Six Categories of Authority Conciliation Officer, Board of Conciliation, Court of Inquiry, Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal, National Tribunal; plus voluntary arbitration
Conciliation Authorities
Section 4 Conciliation Officer First-line authority appointed by appropriate government to mediate in and promote settlement of industrial disputes
Conciliation Officer Powers Powers to enter premises, call for documents, examine on oath, conduct hearings; mediatory not adjudicatory
Conciliation Officer Failure Report Where conciliation fails, Officer submits failure report to appropriate government, which decides whether to refer dispute to adjudication
Section 5 Board of Conciliation Higher conciliation forum constituted by appropriate government for substantial or complex disputes; tripartite composition
Board Tripartite Constitution Independent chairman plus equal numbers of representatives of employers and workers, recommended by parties
Court of Inquiry
Section 6 Court of Inquiry Constituted by appropriate government to inquire into matters connected with or relevant to industrial disputes; investigative role
Court of Inquiry Investigative Role Submits report to appropriate government within six months; rarely used in contemporary practice
Adjudication Authorities
Section 7 Labour Court Constituted for adjudication of disputes relating to Second Schedule matters; one presiding officer
Labour Court Qualifications Judge of High Court, District Judge or Additional District Judge for 3+ years, judicial office for 7+ years, or presiding officer of state Labour Court for 5+ years
Second Schedule Matters Includes propriety of standing order, application of standing orders, discharge or dismissal, withdrawal of customary concession, illegality of strike or lockout
Section 7A Industrial Tribunal Constituted for adjudication of Second or Third Schedule matters; one presiding officer with similar qualifications to Labour Court
Industrial Tribunal Assessors Appropriate Government may appoint two persons as assessors to advise the Tribunal in proceedings, supplementing the presiding officer
Third Schedule Matters Includes wages, allowances, hours and rest intervals, leave and holidays, bonus, PF, gratuity, shift working, classification, discipline, retrenchment, closure
Section 7B National Tribunal Constituted by Central Government only for disputes of national importance or affecting establishments in more than one state
National Tribunal Central Government Constitution Distinctively constituted by central government rather than appropriate government; rare use but provides institutional capacity for nationally significant disputes
Voluntary Arbitration and Reference
Section 10A Voluntary Arbitration Parties may agree by written agreement to refer dispute to arbitrator(s) of their choice before reference under Section 10; introduced in 1956
Arbitration Award Binding Force Arbitration award binding on parties with same effect as adjudication award; provides alternative to government-controlled adjudication track
Section 10 Reference Power Where appropriate government opines dispute exists or apprehended, may refer to Board of Conciliation, Court of Inquiry, Labour Court, or Industrial Tribunal
Reference Forum Selection Appropriate government decides which forum based on schedule matters and policy considerations; substantive policy lever historically used to channel disputes
Award and Settlement Effect
Section 17 Publication of Award Award required to be published in Official Gazette by appropriate government within 30 days of receipt
Section 17A Commencement of Award Award becomes enforceable on expiry of 30 days from publication; provides time for any public-interest intervention by appropriate government
Public Interest Exception Appropriate government may declare award not enforceable on expiry of 30 days where inexpedient on public grounds affecting national economy or social justice
Section 19 Period of Operation Settlement binding for agreed period or 6 months default; continues until expiry of 2 months from termination notice. Award operates for 1 year from enforceability
Termination of Settlement Settlement may be terminated by 2 months' notice from one party to others; provides controlled exit from binding settlement at end of operative period